Newsletter No 31
Spring 2007
Editorial: The Election
It's been long enough coming and now at last it is nigh: the general
election. Representatives from all the political parties will be coming
to your door and asking for your vote. Please mention access to the
countryside and the need for legal rights for recreational users! There
are three aspects: freedom to roam the 7% of the country under rough
grazing, a reasonable network of rights of way elsewhere and an end to
ugly fencing over what was previously open, remote land.
Rest assured that Keep Ireland Open, as it has been doing for over a
decade, will be taking the message to the politicians. But
unfortunately, we are practically alone: no other national organization
is actively with us in our campaign. On the other side we are confronted
by the main farming organizations, with all the legal power, and armed
with a ruthless sense of righteousness, no matter how threadbare and
unfair their arguments are.
Don't think that we will get anywhere or convince anyone by standing
back and hoping that justice and fair play will prevail without an
effort on our part. Life, and in particular political life, is simply
not like that. We all have to get out there and put the case for legal
access, politely but persistently.
You may say that you haven't got all the facts and figures at your
fingertips. Neither have the politicians! Indeed if you have read or
even glanced through previous editions of this newsletter you will know
far more than the average politician, who after all is expected to have
a considered opinion on every issue from Mrs Murphy's plumbing to global
warming.
You can get plenty of information from the Keep Ireland Open website
or by asking any committee member if you have a particular problem.
So, please remember, if you want legal rights you have to put the
case. Otherwise, politicians, being human, will think there is no
problem.
Tourism: Ireland and Scotland compared
We have been carrying out some instructive research into walking
tourism in Ireland and Scotland. The two countries are more or less
comparable: about the same area, population and cost of living. Scotland
might be a little more accessible and has far more wild country. Ireland
has a much better climate and fewer midges! It is estimated that in 2005
UK (including Scottish) walking tourists in Scotland spent 803m and
overseas tourists spent 317m, so giving a total of 1120m. (There
are a few assumptions in these figures but they are reasonable ones). In
2004 (the last year for which figures are available) overseas walking
tourists in Ireland spent 170m (per Fαilte Ireland). There are no
figures for the amount spent by domestic walkers (see note below) giving
a total of 250.
So 1120m for Scotland and 250m for Ireland. We are not doing
too well, are we?
And the reason? Well, we would say, wouldn't we, that it is the lack
of legal access to the countryside in Ireland compared to almost
unlimited legal access in Scotland. But not simply and directly that. If
there is no legal access then a lot flows from that. We have very few
rights of way (even the long-distance way-marked routes are permissive),
and for those few that might exist we are so unsure about their status
that we cannot provide signposts or mark them on the maps; we lack
stiles, bridges, clear paths in remote areas, we lack guidebooks. In a
word we lack the infrastructure that walkers now take for granted in
other lands and one way or the other it comes down to lack of access.
Note: we estimated the domestic walking market in Ireland as follows.
The Scottish market includes the whole of the UK and as we stated above
it generates 803m. Let's say that the Irish domestic market is one
tenth of the Scottish (a generous estimate based on the fact that the
total population of Ireland is 4m and the UK is 4m and the UK is
60). Then the irish domestic market generates about 80m, as we stated.
Keep Ireland Open's AGM
Our AGM will be held on
Saturday April 28th 2007
at
An Óige's Dublin Hostel
61 Mountjoy Street
Dublin 7
at 11:30 am
Keynote Speaker : Ruairi Quinn T.D.
Please be there
|
Research
We have asked the Ramblers Association in England (Wales and Scotland
have different mechanisms) about the workings of the cross-compliance
schemes there. Farmers there have to carry out environmental measures to
qualify for their grants under CAP. These measures include keeping a
border on their fields to encourage wildlife and the maintenance of
rights of way across their property. If they don't carry out these
measures they lose all or part of their CAP grant/ Could the same apply
to Ireland?
Unfortunately, it appears not, though we cannot be absolutely sure.
The Ramblers Association state that first the jurisdiction has to have
the law in place; then the sanctions apply. Since there are few rights
of way across private land in Ireland and no semblance of freedom to
roam, Ireland cannot simply apply cross-compliance measure to promote
access to the countryside. First comes the law, then the sanctions via
CAP, or that is how it works in England. Maybe someone knows other
procedures that could be applied here.
The Media
A report on national radio and the newspapers that agreement was
imminent between the Government in the person of MinisterO'Cuiv and the
IFA over the latter's Walkways Scheme, hit the headlines at the end of
last year and into this. You will recall that the Scheme proposed
colossal payments to farmers for allowing a skeletal network of
permissive paths. The story put about was that the farmers might (the
details on this point are suitably vague) do some maintenance work and
the Government would cough up something approximating to what the IFA
were demanding, Fine, except there is no truth in the story: it seems to
have been a fabrication of the IFA's. Before the story was dropped KIO
had several letters in the national press expressing doubt about the
'agreement' and disputing Michael Viney's article in the Irish Times,
which gave an unrealistic evaluation of the state of access to the
countryside based on the untrue story.
*****************************************************
Forget Iraq: A farmer in Ireland threatened to stab me for being on
his land
And here is just the type of publicity Irish tourism does not need.
The British newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, had the following
interchange on the 5th February with John Teeling, the high-flying
chairman of several important natural resources companies and founder of
Cooley Distillery: Q What's the scariest situation you've ever been in A
forget Iraq: a farmer in Ireland, two miles from where my mother was
born, threatened to stab me in the chest for being on his land.
******************************************************
And in short: KIO had letters in several national newspapers about
the unhappy fallout for walkers following on from the Nally case. Our
chairman, Roger Garland, had an article in the current An Taisce
magazine giving the current state of play on the issues of rights of way
and freedom to roam. A long article in the Sunday Times in February
seemed to come straight from Minister O'Cuiv's spin doctor section. KIO
firmly refuted this inaccurate evaluation in a follow-up letter.
******************************************************
Article in Irish Times of Monday April 16th
The Irish Times has a series of articles where two people argue opposite sides of a debate.
On Monday April 16th the question posed was; should farmers be paid to allow KIO to access their
land?. David Herman said No and gave a good summary of the KIO position on access. Padraig Walsh,
president of the IFA, said YES and argued the case as seen by the farming organisations. The article
can be read on a website associated with the series www.ireland.com/head2head There is also a facility
to vote on the issue on this website. We would like to ask our members and supporters to take the trouble
to vote for our position in this debate. It only involves the click of a mouse. Also it needs to be done
immediately before voting closes.
*******************************************************
Insurance for walkers
It might be of some interest to hill walking clubs that Gogan
Insurances have launched what they call 'a wider cover at more
competitive premiums' than exists at present. You can get more details
from Gogan Insurances phone: 01-2990299 or by e-mail at
info@gogans.ie .
Britain : Minister warns of end to farming subsidies
By Andy McSmith, London Independent
British farmers were warned yesterday that they can expect an end to
all subsidies for growing food in 2020, when the only payments they get
from the public will be as managers of the landscape. The warning came
in a speech by the Environment Secretary David Miliband, to the Oxford
Farming Conference, which also heard from the Conservative leader, David
Cameron. Mr Miliband said: "We need an industry that is profitable
in the marketplace. It will continue to produce the majority of the food
we consume and contribute to our exports - but there just isn't a food
security argument for taxpayers to subsidise food production. His
announcement was welcomed by the Conservative MEP, Syed Kamall, who sits
on Mr Cameron's policy review group on global policy. He said that food
subsidies could be scrapped sooner than 2020 if world leaders were
serious about tackling poverty. There are ethical and practical
arguments in favour of the total abolition of EU subsidies, " he
said. [ KIO notes: Whatever about the details this is the way thinking
is heading in Europe and Irish farmers might take note of it.]
Launch of the friends of Irish Hill walking
The ramblers have been consulting walking clubs across the country
about the possibility of a national grouping of hill walking clubs and
interested individuals. The object would be to better represent the
interests of hill walkers than existing umbrella organisations do.
Access will of course feature as one of the most important issues.
Encouraged by the initial positive response, the Ramblers are hosting a
meeting in the Red Cow Inn, Naas Road, Dublin 22 at 2.30 p.m. on
Saturday 28th April (unfortunately the same day as KIO's AGM ). You can
reach it most easily by taking the LUAS to the Red Cow stop. It will not
be all serious business. Apart from wine and nibbles at the meeting
itself the Ramblers intend to organise a walk on the Sunday in the
Wicklow Mountains. So, if you are interested in the future of hill
walking in Ireland and especially if you are prepared to put in a
modicum of work to get this grouping up and running the Ramblers would
love to see you there. Further information at e-mail HWGComment@yahoo.ie
or by post at Hill Walkers Interest Group, 17 Balally Drive, Dundrum,
Dublin 16.
Irish Trails Strategy
Of the trails in the State 55% are on public roads and lanes, 24% in
Coillte land and only 14% over private land.
In mid January the Irish Sports Council (ISC) unveiled their Trails
Strategy, which covers cycling as well as walking. Speaking at the
launch the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism stated that walking
tourists stay longer in Ireland than other holidaymakers and give a more
even regional distribution. The strategy promises short to medium length
walks in and between towns and rural areas, a better coordinated
approach to marketing, the provision of better maps, signage, parking
etc for the 8,300km of walks already in place. It promises an extended
network in the future. All of which is very fine and must be welcomed.
However the elephant in the room that is barely adverted to in the
Strategy is legislation to give some rights to recreational users to
access privately owned land. This was the point strongly made by KIO
(among others) in its submission to the ISC and was duly ignored. In
spite of its lavish praise of landowners the Strategy admits that only
14% of the existing permissive ways (which haven't the permanence of
rights of way) run over private land. This means that many sections of
trails run through coniferous forest (24% over Coillte land) and on
public roads and lanes (55%), some of the latter carrying heavy traffic.
Until there is legislation we cannot see that this unsatisfactory
situation can improve; indeed the IFA's present grasping attitude in its
Walkways Scheme ensure that most additions to the present meagre network
of walking routes will continue to be routed through State and
semi-State land.
C na T's Expert Group
At the February meeting of Comhairle na Tuaite Minister Eamon O'Cuiv
announced that the Expert Group was now up and running, with a remit to
report by April 30th. The Group, headed by a Senior Counsel, is to look
at the legal implications of the 'broad issue of general access to the
countryside for recreational users'. The terms of reference are broadly
in line with what KIO have been suggesting. The Minister also stated
that rights of way should be listed by local authorities and that, in
the event of a dispute, these would go to arbitration in the first
instance rather than to the courts. While KIO welcomes these initiatives
we wonder how useful they will be unless legislation is enacted to
counteract the decision in the Glencree High Court case. We await
developments.
Rights of Way and the County Councils
KIO puts in a lot of work behind the scenes in trying to persuade
local authorities to list rights of way in their Development Plans. It
is very tedious work and involves lengthy submissions to Council
Planners and many phone calls to lobby councillors. Even when the
commitment to list is included in a Plan, to actually get the Council
staff to make a start requires a lot of prodding. There's little use in
complaining to councillors as they have moved on to other issues. We do
try to put a time frame for producing a list, but even if this is done
there are many excuses for procrastination. We would single out Wicklow,
a county vital for hill walkers, as a real black spot. It is now almost
15 years since listing has been on the agenda and not one single right
of way has been unearthed yet there must be hundreds. Dun Laoghaire/Rathdown
is the only local authority with a reasonably comprehensive list. Other
counties where some progress has been made are Wexford, Clare , Mayo,
South Tipperary, Fingal, South Dublin, Kilkenny and Meath.
The Nally Case
The verdict in the Nally case increases the well-founded fears that
walkers must have in venturing onto the mountains and hills of Ireland.
It now seems that you can shoot and wound an intruder, beat him
senseless and when he is hobbling out and on the public road, come back
and shoot him again to kill. And since you are 'only' defending your
property you are innocent of any crime! Surely this is a most
unsatisfactory situation and puts the defence of public property above
human life. Little wonder then that, as a recent letter writer in the
Irish Times stated, he would prefer to walk somewhere other than his
native land where he faces an uncertain welcome.
Meeting with Wicklow Mountains National Park
Three members of KIO, but also representing the Ramblers and the
Enniskerry Walking Association, met with two senior officials of the
WMNP in February. We expressed our concern about the steady
deterioration of the already minimal facilities for recreational users,
especially the alarming reduction in the number of car parking areas and
steadily worsening path erosion. We also mentioned the absence of
footbridges, stiles, signposts, and paths through State land, never mind
paths that are needed through private land in order to access the Park
itself. The WMNP stated that they were aware of all these problems and
would tackle them as soon as they could but it would take a long time
given their limited funding. They stated that the only task done so far
was to monitor the condition of about 170km of footpath. It is a sad
reflection that in a country awash with money, more cannot be assigned
to an area so worthy of funding.
Fencing in Killarney
The Killarney Nature Conservation Group (KNCG) has complained to the
European Commission about a controversial fencing project in Killarney
National Park. The project consists of fencing off part of the native
woodland in the Park and is being carried out by the National Parks and
Wildlife Service (NPWS), ostensibly to protect these woodlands. In spite
of the fact that no Environmental Impact Assessment has been carried out
as required, the NPWS has gone ahead and done considerable damage over a
6-8 km stretch of the woodlands. In addition it has damaged pre-famine
settlement walls, lazy beds and at least one stone cottage. KCNG insists
that the NWPS has completely ignored a study on the effects of fencing
off areas of these woodlands that has been going on for over 30 yrs. The
authoritative study shows that fencing off areas from all grazers led to
an overall reduction in plant diversity. KNCG's main concern however is
that the project will substantially alter the woodland ecology by
excluding the native herd of red deer. What is required, they say, is a
cull of the deer and feral population (together with the complete
exclusion of sheep) to keep the grazing within manageable levels. This
is the approach that has been carried out successfully by Scottish
Heritage and in similar circumstances.
The Bray-Greystones Cliff Walk - Again!
'The thought of erecting a short bridge over the eroded section has
evidently not occurred to the Council' .....
You may recall that the above 5km walk was opened to a great fanfare
in summer 2005. Now it has closed again. Well, not closed exactly, since
all and sundry, except those unfamiliar with our odd way of treating
warning signs, still use this popular walk. What happened is that a few
metre of the path near Greystones has collapsed due to coastal erosion
and therefore you have to be careful in getting around it. So what do
Wicklow County Council do? Firstly they put up signs at each end of the
walk stating that the entire 5km of the walk is blocked. Then they
replaced these by half-hearted barriers that strollers have gone around
or broken through. The though of erecting a sign giving details of the
subsidence and warning that you walk it at your own risk or better still
erecting a short bridge over the eroded section has evidently not
occurred to the Council! Meanwhile those not in the know (and many
foreigners use this walk) either turn back or wonder what is the purpose
of signs in this country.
Have your say!...
Is there anything you are just dying to express about KIO's policy,
access problems in your area, or access in general? Then let us know and
you can have a slot in this newsletter. But keep it short; a couple of
hundred words is enough. Send your contributions to KIO's e-mail address
info@keepirelandopen.org
Correspondence
If you have any comments on the newsletter or any other
aspect of our campaign or if you would like to describe your own
problems with access to the countryside send correspondence to
The Secretary, KIO, 56 Pine Valley Avenue, Rathfarnham,
Dublin 16
Links to Affiliated
organisations
An Óige
Association of Irish
Riding Clubs
Dingle
Hillwalking Club
Federation of Local History Societies
Catholic Girl Guides of Ireland
Irish Ramblers
Club
Irish Rural
Link
Irish Wildlife
Trust
Killarney
Mountaineering Club
Scouting
Ireland
or e-mail : info@keepirelandopen.org
Previous
Newsletters: July
1999, October
1998, July
2000, May
2002 Nov
2002 February
2003 May
2003 August
2003 Winter 2003/2004
Spring 2004
Summer 2004
Winter 2004/2005
Spring 2005
Summer/Autumn
2005 Winter 2005/2006
Spring 2006
Summer 2006
Autumn
2006 Spring
2007
If you would like to
inform us of any problems in your area please email us at info@keepirelandopen.org
home | aims | issues | policies | role &
tactics | newsletter | How to
Join | letters | contact